Stop Treating Every Empty Truck the Same

Stop Treating Every Empty Truck the Same

Every empty truck represents a problem for a transportation company. It could mean lost revenue, missed opportunities, additional pressure on existing drivers, or equipment sitting idle when it should be moving freight. Naturally, when trucks become unseated, leadership turns to recruiting and asks how quickly those positions can be filled.

But here's a question that doesn't get asked nearly enough: Are all those empty trucks equally important to the business?

Imagine a fleet with 20 open driving positions spread across several terminals. Some are tied to dedicated customer accounts, others support regional operations, and a few are needed for anticipated growth. Recruiting sees 20 openings that need to be filled, but operations may see 20 very different business situations.

One open truck might be putting a major customer relationship at risk. Another might represent a profitable opportunity the company can't take advantage of. A third may be sitting in a market where freight demand has slowed and the urgency isn't quite as high.

Yet many fleets approach these openings with similar recruiting strategies, budgets, and expectations.

What if the most effective recruiting strategy wasn't simply filling every open truck as quickly as possible, but understanding which trucks matter most to the business and why?

An Empty Truck Is More Than an Open Position

Inside recruiting, open positions are often measured in straightforward terms. How many drivers do we need? How many applications are coming in? How quickly can we get someone through orientation?

Those are important questions, but they don't tell the entire story.

From an operational perspective, an empty truck can represent different levels of financial exposure depending on the freight, customer, location, and equipment involved. A truck assigned to a high-volume dedicated account may have a very different economic impact than one intended for a market where freight opportunities are less consistent.

Consider two openings. One supports a dedicated customer that needs reliable capacity every week. Leaving that truck unseated could force the carrier to turn down loads, rearrange drivers, or create service problems. The other is an additional truck the fleet hopes to put into service as demand increases.

Both positions matter, but the business consequences of leaving them unfilled are very different. When recruiting treats them as identical, the company risks directing the same resources toward opportunities with very different returns.

Recruiting Priorities Should Reflect Business Priorities

Most recruiting teams receive hiring goals from operations or leadership. A terminal needs five drivers, another needs eight, and a third needs three. Those numbers become recruiting targets, and the team gets to work.

What often gets lost is the reasoning behind those numbers.

Are the openings replacing drivers who recently left? Are they supporting a new customer? Is the fleet expanding into a new market? Are there contractual service expectations involved?

Those details matter because they influence how aggressively a position should be recruited.

If a carrier has an opportunity to add several trucks to a profitable dedicated account, it may make sense to invest more heavily in recruiting for those positions. If another opening has less immediate urgency, the company may have more flexibility in how it allocates resources.

This doesn't mean certain positions should be ignored. It means recruiting should understand which openings deserve immediate attention and where additional investment could create the greatest business impact.

The hiring goal tells recruiting how many drivers the company needs. The business context tells recruiting where to focus first.

The Cost of an Empty Truck Isn't Always the Same

Transportation companies already understand that different trucks, customers, and lanes generate different financial results. Revenue, operating costs, equipment utilization, and profitability vary across the business.

Recruiting economics should account for those differences too.

Imagine a hypothetical situation where leaving one truck unseated creates an estimated $1,500 in lost contribution margin each week, while another creates $500. Actual economics vary by operation, but the example illustrates why the distinction matters.

If filling the first position requires an additional $1,000 in recruiting investment and gets a qualified driver seated sooner, that investment may be relatively easy to justify. Spending the same amount on the second position might require a different calculation.

The key is evaluating recruiting investment against the economic benefit of filling the position sooner, rather than looking only at advertising costs or cost per hire.

A $3,000 cost per hire might be expensive for one opening and reasonable for another. Without understanding the business impact, it's difficult to know the difference.

The Hardest Position to Fill Isn't Always the Most Important

Recruiting teams naturally spend significant time on positions that are difficult to fill. A job that's been open for 60 days attracts attention, leadership wants answers, and additional advertising dollars may be directed toward the problem.

But difficulty and importance aren't necessarily the same thing.

A challenging position in a smaller market may consume enormous recruiting effort while another, more financially important opening receives less attention simply because it hasn't been open as long.

The reverse can happen too. A difficult-to-fill position may be tied to a critical customer relationship, making it one of the most important openings in the company.

The point isn't to prioritize easy jobs over hard jobs. It's to understand the relationship between recruiting difficulty, operational urgency, and financial impact.

A position shouldn't automatically become the highest priority because it's been open the longest. It should be evaluated based on what filling it actually means to the business.

Not Every Market Requires the Same Recruiting Investment

Once a fleet understands which openings matter most, the next question becomes how difficult those positions will be to fill.

A dedicated position in one market might attract plenty of qualified drivers with modest advertising investment. The same position in another market could face intense competition, a smaller available driver population, or less attractive home-time expectations.

That's why recruiting budgets shouldn't be determined by urgency alone.

At HireMaster, we focus on helping fleets understand the recruiting environment surrounding a position before deciding how to approach it. That can include evaluating the available driver population, identifying competing employers, comparing job offers, and examining what other carriers are advertising in a specific market.

When that market intelligence is combined with the business importance of an opening, the recruiting strategy becomes much more informed.

A high-priority opening in a difficult market may justify additional advertising, stronger candidate engagement, or changes to how the position is presented. A similar opening in a more favorable market might be filled efficiently without a significant budget increase.

The objective isn't to spend more on every important opening. It's to understand what it will realistically take to fill each position and whether that investment makes sense.

Recruiting and Operations Need to Be Looking at the Same Picture

Operations knows which trucks are creating service problems, where customer commitments are at risk, and which parts of the fleet have the strongest opportunities for growth. Recruiting knows where qualified drivers are available, which positions attract interest, and how candidates respond to different job offers.

Those perspectives are most valuable when they're combined.

Imagine a weekly meeting where operations doesn't simply hand recruiting a list of open trucks. Instead, the team reviews which openings are most urgent, what business impact they're creating, how difficult each market is to recruit in, and what resources are needed.

That conversation might reveal that one position needs immediate additional investment, another requires changes to the job offer, and a third can be supported through the existing recruiting strategy.

Rather than treating recruiting as a department responsible for filling requests, the organization begins treating it as part of its capacity planning process.

Sometimes the Best Decision Isn't to Recruit Harder

Not every open truck should automatically trigger a larger recruiting investment.

If a position is consistently expensive to fill, experiences high turnover, and supports an operation with limited profitability, leadership may need to evaluate whether the underlying business model makes sense.

Could the schedule be adjusted? Would a different home-time arrangement improve the available driver pool? Is compensation competitive enough for the work required? Could the freight be handled differently?

These aren't decisions recruiting can make independently, but recruiting performance can provide valuable information for them.

Sometimes the answer is better advertising. Sometimes it's a more competitive job offer. And sometimes the company needs to reconsider how the work is structured.

Every Empty Truck Matters. Just Not in the Same Way.

For years, transportation companies have measured recruiting success largely through applications, hires, cost per hire, and how quickly positions are filled. Those metrics are valuable, but they don't always explain whether recruiting resources are being directed toward the opportunities that matter most.

A fleet could fill ten positions and still struggle with its most important customer account. Another could fill fewer positions but create a greater financial impact because those hires supported the right parts of the operation.

That's why recruiting should be connected to the business decisions that create the demand for drivers in the first place. Leadership needs to understand not only how much it costs to fill a position, but also what that hire contributes to the operation.

So the next time your recruiting team receives a list of 20 empty trucks, don't just ask how quickly they can fill them.

Ask which trucks the business needs filled first, what those openings are worth, and whether your recruiting strategy reflects that reality.

Because every empty truck matters. Just not in the same way. Schedule a demo with our team today, to see where your recruiting dollars can be spent more efficiently for your recruiting markets and situation.

‍